Who says we have to continue to stay the course? I say no. No to Federal Government Governing. We have little need for the President to set rules and guidelines for more than interstate commerce, sealing the borders and protecting them with troops and patrols, and directing and conducting a military that is staffed with Generals, Colonels, and Sargents. They need staffs and a central control, but all enlisted men and women below these ranks need not be perpetually employed. War is hell. Why have constant combat? Why have duty in other places where we are not at war?
Vetoes should be often. And treaties should be few. Recess appointments are sneaky, yet are necessary only if nomination processes are stalled.
I believe the way states should be controlled is by rating them by comparative records. No state should be mandated to do more for their people. They should not have a federal regulation to be followed. Only to obey the Constitution and allow the Federal Government to fulfill all of it's duties. There is no reason to litigate if there is not intervention prior. The relationship between the states and federal government should be in intervening between states due to conflicts and compacts and contracts and to enforce the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
No comments:
Post a Comment